0 comments
Comments sorted by top scores.
comment by James_Miller · 2019-07-28T19:57:41.783Z · LW(p) · GW(p)
I have been taking Metformin for several years for anti-aging reasons. There is a massive literature on Metformin which I'm not going to try to summarize but I think that everyone over 40 should take it. I also take a NAD+ booster (Tru Niagen).
Replies from: adele-lopez-1, Wei_Dai, ioannes_shade, ioannes_shade↑ comment by Adele Lopez (adele-lopez-1) · 2019-07-29T03:10:51.779Z · LW(p) · GW(p)
Is there a reason not to take it if you're younger than 40?
Replies from: PeterMcCluskey, James_Miller↑ comment by PeterMcCluskey · 2019-08-01T20:28:05.114Z · LW(p) · GW(p)
Metformin has a bunch of undesirable side effects. I don't see an easy way to quantify the importance of those side effects, so I try to evaluate how likely it is that the benefits of metformin will apply to me.
The obvious way in which metformin might cure or prevent age-related diseases is by curing insulin resistance. Some educated-sounding people have been saying that insulin resistance contributes significantly to Western disease (aka diseases of civilization, including cardiovascular disease, diabetes, dementia, and some subset of cancer). Doctors have arguably been undertreating insulin resistance, because it doesn't produce immediate disease-like symptoms. Maybe if metformin were still patented, the patentholder would be pushing the FDA to get insulin resistance classified as a disease.
Insulin resistance seems to be non-existent in cultures that most resemble our pre-farming ancestors, so it sure looks like it's avoidable via lifestyle changes (the best guesses are diet (high fiber, whole foods), exercise, and sleep). That suggests it's possible, although maybe hard, to get the benefits attributed to metformin without the side effects.
I pay close attention to my insulin resistance, via blood tests, and have avoided metformin for now because it looks like my lifestyle is good enough that I have few insulin-related risks so far. If my A1C gets above 5.6, I'll think pretty carefully about getting metformin.
Replies from: gwern↑ comment by gwern · 2019-08-01T22:11:30.421Z · LW(p) · GW(p)
The impression I got from asking people like James about metformin side-effects when I was trying a cost-benefit is that most of it has quick onset, like the gastrointestinal distress, and if you can't fix it by modifying the dose, you can simply discontinue it ie you have option value. This would reduce the EV a little but is not that big a deal. After all, metformin is one of the most (the most?) widely used chronic prescription drugs in the world & regarded as very safe, so the side effects can't be that bad, one would think.
The question of redundancy with other interventions is a more concerning one. Not all the metformin papers are positive in this regard. Here's a small paper suggesting that metformin blunts the benefits of exercise, and "Metformin alters the gut microbiome of individuals with treatment-naive type 2 diabetes, contributing to the therapeutic effects of the drug", Wu et al 2017, suggests part of metformin's benefits is by changing the microbiome, but of course, exercise or diet or lifestyle changes might also be changing the microbiome in precisely the same way... For diabetics, who have done what little they are able or willing to do, that presumably is not happening enough to cure their diabetes and so the average metformin effect is still worthwhile, but for those more rigorous about longevity, who knows?
I have similar concerns about baby aspirin and everything postulated to involve inflammation, and perhaps also the senolytics as well: they often seem to be hypothesized to be acting through similar pathways (eg inflammation causes/is caused by senescent cells, some say, but if exercise kills senescent cells by inducing autophagy, doesn't that imply it'd be at least partially redundant with taking a senolytic drug?). I'm not sure what could be done here except to directly test the potential for interactions in factorial experiments.
↑ comment by James_Miller · 2019-07-29T16:04:37.185Z · LW(p) · GW(p)
It might be that everyone should take it, but the case for people over 40 seems clearer based on my non-expert interpretation of what it does because of their much greater risk of heart failure.
↑ comment by Wei Dai (Wei_Dai) · 2019-07-28T20:08:18.932Z · LW(p) · GW(p)
I would be interested in Metformin but I think it's a prescription drug in the US? How does one get access to it as a supplement?
Replies from: James_Miller↑ comment by James_Miller · 2019-07-28T23:12:11.334Z · LW(p) · GW(p)
I have convinced two U.S. doctors (my first left general practice) to give me a prescription. I explained that I wanted the drug to reduce the risk of heart disease and cancer. I also explained that since the drug was cheap I would not be asking my insurance to pay for it so my doctor would not have to justify the prescription to my insurance company. If you ask for a prescription know what dosage you want and look up the possible negative side effects so it seems to your doctor that you have done your homework on the drug. If you have some reason why you are at a high risk for diabetes (such as a close relative has it) mention this as the drug is used to prevent diabetes.
↑ comment by ioannes (ioannes_shade) · 2019-07-28T23:41:44.025Z · LW(p) · GW(p)
Thanks! This meta-analysis of Metformin makes it seem promising.
↑ comment by ioannes (ioannes_shade) · 2020-01-20T07:00:06.033Z · LW(p) · GW(p)
Apparently Metformin doesn't work when used by itself: https://nintil.com/longevity
(I haven't poked the underlying studies.)
Replies from: jlricon↑ comment by Jose Luis Ricon (jlricon) · 2020-01-23T19:18:57.328Z · LW(p) · GW(p)
I (the author of the FAQ) now have a bit more of an optimistic conclusion; but yeah I wouldn't just take metformin if you are healthy. Fwiw what -I- personally do in terms of supplements is just https://labdoor.com/review/whc-unocardio-1000-vitamin-d-1000 . Idk how strong the Vitamin D effect is, but I don't get much sun in the UK anyway. I think for overall health calorie restriction / intermittent fasting is the best intervention. Perhaps there are other things one can do in addition, but I think most of the value in terms of overall health can be achieved with this one thing.
comment by ioannes (ioannes_shade) · 2020-11-20T22:00:26.800Z · LW(p) · GW(p)
It looks like glucosamine may help reduce all-cause mortality (UK Biobank study), so I might start taking that as well.