Less Wrong Facebook Page

...I'll start by pointing out that I'm female.

In the case of comments on a blog (or members obviously joining a facebook group) sometimes this can be a form of self-selection bias combined with female cultural norms.

I was taught that you only say something if you feel that it adds to the conversation... and females are often "taught" low self esteem... which means that from what I know of female culture, women are less likely to post than men due to a combination of feeling a bit overwhelmed at the l33t skillz shown here and not feeling worthy. So one (small) part of the reason you see less women, is that those that are here - are less likely to post/comment.

That being said - that is also likely combined with an actual lower distribution of women arriving at the site - which is likely linked to all the same reasons why women aren't as high a proportion of mathematicians or computer-programmers.

I've been both (and a lot of other usually-male-dominated hobbies also) and I can attest to being made to feel like a weirdo by other women (and some men, though mostly women). My guess is that a lot of this is simply because it makes me stick out... "other women aren't doing it... so why would you want to, you weirdo"... and thus becomes a vicious cycle.

I don't think there's anything inherent in women (or men) that makes them more or less likely to be interested. but women that are have to be capable of "speaking the truth, even when your voice trembles" about being interested in something that "tradition" holds as being mainly a male field... and wiling to sustain the effort to break the norms and continue to participate despite being looked at like they have just grown body parts unnatural to their gender.

Edit: In fact, the recent story about Katie and the Star Wars Lunchbox is a very good example of how this happens in practice. http://www.chicagonow.com/blogs/portrait_of_an_adoption/2010/11/anti-bullying-starts-in-first-grade.html

I'm still not entirely sure what's up with that. Yeah, I plan to post about it at some point.

I'm rather skeptical, to say the least, that seeing people's photographs will make me more interested in their ideas.

Obligatory cynicism: It will make you more interested in their ideas if and only if the photograph makes them look attractive, c.f. all the research showing cognitive biases in favor of tall, good-looking people.

See also the Meetup.com group.

Why?

Why?

Why?

Why?

Why?

Why?

Why?

Why?

One of the goals I've seen emerging here is to build effective, rational groups. If they're so fragile they can't survive emotional engagement, or even seeing each others' photos, that's a good thing to find out sooner rather than later.

It isn't that hard.