A modest spelling reform to increase autologicity, symmetry, and readability.

post by Randomized, Controlled (BossSleepy) · 2022-02-05T21:09:18.466Z · LW · GW · 2 comments

Contents

  Appendix on negative numbers
None
2 comments

At this point, if one is working in a digital medium where one maybe have a blissful disregard for line length, one may happily continue onwards to tttttttten up past.. errmm.. tttttttten x tttttttten and beyond. However, if writing for the printed page, we may be force into a sadly more parsimonious form:

up to and progressively beyond

Appendix on negative numbers

Negatives are most naturally treated in this system by simply reversing their positive representations, thus:

If o must be disambiguated from it's negation, positive o may be indicated as .o and negative as o.

The denotation of the null quantity is still a somewhat controversial topic, with many advocating for ., but a vocal minority are still strong proponents of:

2 comments

Comments sorted by top scores.

comment by Randomized, Controlled (BossSleepy) · 2022-02-05T22:50:46.733Z · LW(p) · GW(p)

Pronunciation is left as an exercise to the reader

comment by TLW · 2022-02-08T03:49:17.130Z · LW(p) · GW(p)

So then

 o/to = c

?