Posts
Comments
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)30462-1/fulltext
How many people could we educate this way, for the price of having one study at USA.
Many, but that assumes that the actual quality of the education matters (the most), and not something else, like the opportunity to meet other people who will make up the elite class in the future.
It would even make sense for US citizens to study abroad for economical reasons, if they can't get admitted to an elite US school, but how many future political leaders aren't elite school graduates?
Imagine a 3rd world country, where if the person graduates their best university, most people with real influence won't even be aware of its existence, or of the existence of the city where it's located. How much can that person do? How much more could they do with better networking opportunities?
except climate
Care to elaborate?
prices
It seems to be cheaper than anything west and north of it, except the Baltics. Going by the prices listed here.
Good (frequent/cheap) flight connections are more important than location itself. Flying e.g. from Tallinn to Athens takes about 5 hours (about 3 hours of actual flight time).
being far better at parallelizing and reaction speed
If you use the entities' preferences to decide what's ethical, then everything is (or can be), because you can just adjust their preferences accordingly.
Can't vote, not enough karma. Got 79%.
Short search for "black pepper carcinogenicity" doesn't turn up anything except a few studies on rats and mice, and one of them shows no adverse effect. Do you have anything better?
This is the reason I have mixed feelings about making predictions of events that I can influence. I'm curious whether there is any research about this 'jinxing' - does predicting low chances of success at a task make people less likely to succeed? Or (maybe) the opposite?