I've noticed something curious about creativity. (Like when doing the Babble challenges [LW · GW], or just when thinking in general.)
I have a bad idea. ("Send an object to the moon using a bird in a spacesuit") I don't write it down, instead trying to generate other ideas. Yet the bad idea keeps lingering on my mind. Eventually, I say "okay, fine, I will write you down!" and suddenly there's a sense of flow and relaxation, as if though new space has opened up for other ideas.
If I was advising anyone to start songwriting, I’d just say: write anything that comes into your head. Anything. Just get stuff out there. I kinda treat songwriting as a dirty tap in an old house. When you run a dirty tap, it’s clogged up, bit of dirt in it, bits of mud. You run it, mud’s going to come out, a little bit of water, a bit more mud, and then suddenly it’s going to start flowing clean water.
You’ve got to unclog the pipes when you’re songwriting. So just start writing bad songs. Write songs for the sake of it. Write a song a day. Just sit down, pick a chord, write a song, get that song out of you, and the more and more you do it, the more and more you unclog the pipes.
I’d say, if you want to start songwriting, just start. Don’t worry too much about writing the best songs possible. If anyone wants to listen to growth, go on YouTube, type in “Ed Sheeran Addicted” and you’ll hear a song that I did when I was 12. And the singing is dreadful, the songwriting is dreadful, the guitar playing is dreadful, and now I’m here talking to you as a professional musician.
When I did the "100 ways to light a candle" Babble challenge yesterday, something similar happened. I had the lingering idea of "I could ask someone else to do light the candle", but also thought "That's a boring answer". Yet it kept lingering. Finally, I wrote down "There's a general class of strategies around getting the help of other people". And suddenly that unblocked a whole range of similar ideas -- some of which I really liked, like:
"Destroy a bunch of other light sources in the world, thereby strongly increasing the incentive for others to light this candle"
"Go around the neighbourhood, finding a bunch of lit candles, place them next to you in a beautiful pattern EXCEPT that in a symmetry-breaking place is your candle. Wait until someone fixes it."
It was as if though the initial thought was a bunch of junk clogging the pipe. But by reifying the idea that this was an entire class of strategies, and writing the boring answer down, I suddenly opened up for the water to flow freely through the rest of the pipe.
What on earth is going on here? Why would minds work like this? What does it tell us about the structure of human cognition?
Also, I'm really excited about LessWrong's new prediction feature, so let's make some use of it:
A person that has ot practised will have a theorethical understanding of the process and will think of the requirements ideally. Doing stuff makes it clear that things don't need to be ideal for things to happen. Taking steps proves that steps are possible instead of dreading over how can one ever cross a gap with mere stepping.
I have gone to a phase where you let them come out and just don't count them.
However there was a thing where I was pretty strict on distincness on the listings. Looking at others they were pretty lax on how different each option should be. There were like 20-30 points on others lists that would just fall under
in my brain. (I kinda feel that this is risking pushing against norm not to draw negatives to creative activities but I am focusing on my own here).
One could argue that is a form of blockage. And it was harder to get to 100 while simultanously that every option is not any of the other options.
pyrokinesis and polymorph
one could argue should collapse in some sort of phantasy option.
And yet it feels like
use social pressures to get it done probably has a "umbrella option". Ask X, Sell X, demand X, intimidate X all seemof the formula Y X with social Y where variation of Y doesn't seem to make a fully distinct option. But it feels like my brain can't make that abstraction and somehow that fact makes it okay for them to be different.
probably has a "umbrella option".
Ask X, Sell X, demand X, intimidate X
all seemof the formula Y X with <property kind of interest> Y where variation of Y doesn't seem to make a fully distinct option. But it feels like my brain can't make that abstraction and somehow that fact makes it okay for them to be different.
A little like one could break down
"nuclear fuel" into "fission fuel" and "fusion fuel" and have specific elements for fission fuels.
A superficial understanding makes <them> two phenomena but deeper understanding makes it two aspects of a single thing. With <property of the Y kind> I haven't unified it yet.
I find it easier when I ask myself "is this distinct" that more nebuloous "is this good?" questions don't bother me as much. Or like rather than thinking in terms of "quilty or not quilty" you have "probable cause", "indictable", "beoynd resonable doubt". So instead of being "crap" and "good" ideas you have categories like "explorable", "inspiring", "route", "limit-case", "fashionable""