Posts
Comments
chrome://settings/adPrivacy
This link has a spurious https:// added that breaks it.
I think you mixed up the $100 and $0 conditions.
This is basically my position as well. Without (very) strong evidence that a majority would pick blue, red is the obvious choice. I would choose red in the "real" version and red in the "fake" version as well. If there was a "practice" version so people could indicate their intentions that would be later followed by a real version, then I would pick red in the practice version and would switch to blue in the real version if blue got at least around 2/3 in the practice version.
I think it's especially funny that this is displaying a "resource not found" image for me.
ω is just v/r (v = rω), and translational KE is ½mv² or ½mr²ω², so if rotational KE is ⅕mr²ω², then rotational KE is 10/35 or 29% of total KE.
I guess if we assume the ball is rolling without slipping as it exits the track, then the ratio of translational KE to rotational KE is fixed regardless of what happened earlier in the drop, so maybe it doesn't matter after all.
None of your Twitter links are working for me, even in incognito mode. They just give a generic "Something went wrong. Try reloading." error message.
Guess: The main reason why Alison's calculation was off was because
The correction used for rotational KE assumed the ball was rolling without slipping for the entire decent, whereas in reality, the top of the ramp is steep enough that the ball mostly slides in the initial decent and thus gains less rotational KE than it would otherwise (resulting in more translational KE and a faster exit speed).
Also, when scrolled fully to either end, there remains a large space of the background color that makes it look like the bar is not fully at the end.
Bigger icons! Brighter colors!
yeah, no.
The triangle is the delta symbol, to indicate a change.
I suggest renaming to "missed the mark" to highlight the opposition.
I would rather match Discord's timestamp sorting. Duplicates grouped with the original and new reacts added to the end.
I would like something like a block pushed halfway off a ledge.
I think Discord keeps reacts in timestamp order. Duplicates are grouped with the original, and new ones are added at the end.
Agree with part 1. When I'm trying to decide which of two different reacts to add, it's helpful to have both in view at the same time.
I would expect to see reacts displayed in the same place as the react button (immediately after the karma buttons/display). If reacts are left-aligned just below the username/karma line or at the bottom, then the react button should be there as well.
We, the site moderators, don't take for granted that what makes our community special won't stay that way without intentional effort.
The double negative here distorts the meaning of this sentence.
"party", "ceremony", "dress", "with", "photographer"
While these aren't syntactically valid continuations of the prompt, they are highly likely (and syntactically valid) continuations for "wedding ". More than just being wedding-related, these seem like direct continuations.
Just spitballing here: Assign each voter 100 shares for each candidate. To vote, each voter selects a subset of their shares to constitute their vote. Voters can freely trade shares.
Under this system, a voter would more highly value shares for candidates that are either very high or very low in their preference order (the later so as to exclude them from the vote). Thus, trades would look like each party exchanging shares about which they are themselves ambivalent to gain shares that are more valuable to them.
If you remove the proportional chances part, then it becomes a guessing game of which marginal votes actually matter.
If he does comment further, it's likely to be more of the same.
If Yann responds further, I will update this post.
...
I commit to not covering him further.
These seem to be in conflict.
One possibility is a pervasive SAI sovereign that could detect and prevent this (as well as prevent the creation of other strong AIs).
"Evidence-Based"
Is your suggestion to use these false proofs to train AIs or to train humans (or both)?
You control an unstable process with short-loop feedback. In the pinball analogy, this would be like using your hand to guide the ball between the disks in whatever path you like.
Couldn't this be done in a single instance, by simulating both sides of the conversation?
I got 1 right, 1 partially right, and 2 I couldn't figure out and gave up.
Most worryingly, ChatGPT may think it's a good idea to launch a nuclear second strike and would even advise a nation's president in doing so.
Isn't a consistent policy of second strike retaliation necessary to deter first strikes?
Does this mean the model decides how to construct the glue code at runtime, independently of other runs?
I don’t know how to read ‘19% higher,’ I presume that means 19% less hallucinations but I can also think of several other things that could mean.
This might be referring to the "Internal factual eval by category" chart that showed accuracy going from ~50% to ~70% (i.e. ~19 percentage points, which means more like 40% reduction in hallucination).
The short answer is that it's an analogy to attractors in dynamical systems, where a wide "basin" of initial conditions tend to evolve toward a narrow region of attraction.
The tl;dr here is that you can make an AI that fingerprints its output in a way that can be detected later, but this doesn't generalize to output from other AIs.
Sometimes "try not to err" will result in predictably worse outcomes than "try to minimize the damage your erring causes, even if that means you are more likely or even certain to err".
Find integers a, b, c, such that a³ + b³ + c³ = 42
The solution for this problem was found recently (2019):
42 = (-80,538,738,812,075,974)³ + 80,435,758,145,817,515³ + 12,602,123,297,335,631³
it's clear that a degree from a top-20 school is far better than from a random one, which is better than no degree, in terms of likelihood of being taken seriously as a junior applicant.
Does this also apply to value (to the company) conditional on hiring?
Now I want to see my youtube recommender provide text dialogue to convince me that I really do want to watch what it's selected for me.
Wouldn't a lawyer be more of a compiler or interpreter for the legislature/programmer?
I guess Austria is the AI because
it consistently capitalizes place names.
Regarding the question of how to force all the incentives into one box, what about the following strategy: choose box 1 with probability 1 - (400 - x) epsilon, where x is the payoff of box 1. Then it is obviously in each host's interest to predict box 1, since it has the largest probability of any box, but then it is also in each host's interest to minimize 400 - x i.e. maximize x. This is true even though the hosts' competition is zero-sum.
If the hosts are all predicting box 1, why does it matter with what probability the human picks box 1? (If the hosts' payoffs for all-predict-correctly and all-predict-incorrectly are different, then their game isn't zero-sum.)
The event is more likely to occur if the person is a conspirator, so you hearing the statement should indeed increase your credence for conspiracy (and symmetrically decrease your credence for not-conspiracy).
We called this "Lava Monster Tag" when I was a kid since "the ground is lava", though we only had one monster at a time (sometimes a fixed, larger number for a large playground).
I've read this before. Did you post it, or a version of it, previously?
If team pineapple presses their button, the other team is forced to put pineapple on the pizza they have, and if they press theirs, team pineapple has to pick off their pineapples and throw them away.
I would just call this an extra 'y' sound before the vowel. ([ˈkjuːt] vs. [ˈkuːt])
Why did this post from last month get reposted now?
Something like squaring the size of each voting bloc before doing a weighted random selection? This gives a 90% chance for a 75% majority to win.
wrote the book on how to do it right
Your link just points back to this post.
Narrow interests will always beat broad interests in a democracy
Is this due to lobbying? It seems like the majority should be opposed to this.
At my school, there was a special metal crossbar (essentially just one side of the mattress frame) that you could use to loft without bunking safely.