Resetting my perception of something

post by cousin_it · 2011-10-18T23:24:55.439Z · LW · GW · Legacy · 13 comments

The guy who taught me how to eat sushi a couple months ago explained that I should get a slice of ginger before trying a different kind of sushi in order to "reset my taste buds" (probably broscience) and feel the taste anew (it works). That's also the exact problem that programmers face when trying to design user interfaces: after looking at the thing for a long time, they grow blind to its shortcomings. A visual reset would come in handy. I imagine that resets could help in other areas too. Does anything like that exist? Cogsci majors, help!

13 comments

Comments sorted by top scores.

comment by Vladimir_Golovin · 2011-10-19T07:01:18.245Z · LW(p) · GW(p)

In graphic arts, the fastest way to reset perception is the mirror trick -- just look at your work through the mirror, or, if you're in Photoshop, use Horizontal Flip.

However, the mirror trick never worked for me with user interfaces because the reading diagonal (what's the English term for this?) gets flipped, and various UI conventions such as the OK / Cancel button order get messed up.

For texts, just abstain from looking / editing / thinking about it for at least a few hours, or, ideally, days if you're not under a deadline. Unlike the mirror trick, this approach seems to be universal -- for me, it also worked for many things, including user interfaces and decisions in general.

comment by Nornagest · 2011-10-19T00:38:20.838Z · LW(p) · GW(p)

There are a lot of tricks like this in various fields. One of the simplest ones I can think of comes from the visual arts: when you come to a stopping point, simply turn the paper (canvas, Photoshop workspace, etc.) upside down, and if any of it looks weird from the new perspective, fix that part.

Unfortunately that'd only work for the static parts of UI; I don't know of any better palate-cleanser for the interactive parts of the experience than simply setting the project down for a while and coming back once you've context-switched into something else.

Replies from: jsalvatier
comment by jsalvatier · 2011-10-19T03:29:39.554Z · LW(p) · GW(p)

Perhaps you could try randomly changing parts that aren't what you're focusing on, like drastically changing the color scheme.

Replies from: FiftyTwo
comment by FiftyTwo · 2011-10-19T23:26:20.344Z · LW(p) · GW(p)

Or switch it all to a new font and size so the arrangements of text are different when you reread it.

comment by Manfred · 2011-10-19T00:46:08.012Z · LW(p) · GW(p)

Time off is good for this - for example, when writing, I often set drafts aside for a few days before rewriting.

Maybe closely examining a similar product with a different interface would help?

Replies from: jsalvatier
comment by jsalvatier · 2011-10-19T03:27:55.108Z · LW(p) · GW(p)

Or maybe trying to mock up a design how you imagine someone else would do it? Perhaps a competitor?

comment by calcsam · 2011-10-18T23:49:53.967Z · LW(p) · GW(p)

This might sound obvious, but:

Spending time frequently with different groups of friends with different value systems, each of which (you believe) has an accurate map of different parts of the world.

My experience:

My rationalist friends help me inject more empiricism/anti-happy-death-spiral memes into my church experience; my church friends help me keep other memes like "non-smart people are still worthwhile," "actions perceived as demonstrating character and virtue aren't all just signalling," and of course the "no sex, no drugs" purity meme.

I am in favor of all of the preceding memes but tend to forget each of them over time if I spend too long in a community that doesn't observe them.

Replies from: atorm
comment by atorm · 2011-10-19T13:28:05.589Z · LW(p) · GW(p)

I grew up a very religious child, and I kept the no-sex meme long after I stopped being religious. Can you explain why you value no-sex purity?

comment by NancyLebovitz · 2011-10-19T16:35:56.856Z · LW(p) · GW(p)

A night's sleep can help.

comment by [deleted] · 2011-10-19T07:12:01.897Z · LW(p) · GW(p)

.

Replies from: eugman
comment by eugman · 2011-10-19T19:56:45.742Z · LW(p) · GW(p)

Do you have any theory as to why?

Replies from: None
comment by [deleted] · 2011-10-19T20:27:10.117Z · LW(p) · GW(p)

.

Replies from: eugman
comment by eugman · 2011-10-20T00:34:06.820Z · LW(p) · GW(p)

Ah, sorry I checked out links 2 and 3 and thought they were all twitter links. Very interesting! Thank you for your patience.