Ideas for AI labs: Reading list

post by Zach Stein-Perlman · 2023-04-24T19:00:00.832Z · LW · GW · 0 comments

Contents

  Lists & discussion
  Levers
  Desiderata
  Ideas
    Coordination[1]
    Transparency
    Publication practices
    Structured access to AI models
    Governance structure
    Miscellanea
  See also
None
No comments

Related: AI policy ideas: Reading list.

This document is about ideas for AI labs. It's mostly from an x-risk perspective. Its underlying organization black-boxes technical AI stuff, including technical AI safety.

Lists & discussion

• Towards best practices in AGI safety and governance: A survey of expert opinion (GovAI, Schuett et al. 2023) (LW [LW · GW])
  • This excellent paper is the best collection of ideas for labs. See pp. 18–22 for 100 ideas.
• Frontier AI Regulation: Managing Emerging Risks to Public Safety (Anderljung et al. 2023)
  • Mostly about government regulation, but recommendations on safety standards translate to recommendations on actions for labs
• Model evaluation for extreme risks (DeepMind, Shevlane et al. 2023)
• What AI companies can do today to help with the most important century (Karnofsky 2023) (LW)
• Karnofsky nearcasting: How might we align transformative AI if it’s developed very soon?, Nearcast-based "deployment problem" analysis, and Racing through a minefield: the AI deployment problem (LW) (Karnofsky 2022)
• Survey on intermediate goals in AI governance [EA · GW] (Räuker and Aird 2023)
• Corporate Governance of Artificial Intelligence in the Public Interest (Cihon, Schuett, and Baum 2021) and The case for long-term corporate governance of AI [EA · GW] (Baum and Schuett 2021)
• Three lines of defense against risks from AI (Schuett 2022) 
• The Malicious Use of Artificial Intelligence: Forecasting, Prevention, and Mitigation (Brundage et al. 2018)
• Adapting cybersecurity frameworks to manage frontier AI risks: defense in depth (IAPS, Ee et al. 2023)

Levers

• AI developer levers and AI industry & academia levers in Advanced AI governance (LPP, Maas 2023)
  • This report is excellent
• "Affordances" in "Framing AI strategy" (Stein-Perlman 2023)
  • This list may be more desiderata-y than lever-y

Desiderata

Maybe I should make a separate post on desiderata for labs (for existential safety).

• Six Dimensions of Operational Adequacy in AGI Projects (Yudkowsky 2022)
• "Carefully Bootstrapped Alignment" is organizationally hard (Arnold 2023)
• Slowing AI: Foundations (Stein-Perlman 2023)
• [Lots of stuff implicated elsewhere, like "help others act well" and "minimize diffusion of your capabilities research"]

Ideas

Coordination^[1]

See generally The Role of Cooperation in Responsible AI Development (Askell et al. 2019).

• Coordinate to not train or deploy dangerous AI
  • Model evaluations
    • Model evaluation for extreme risks (DeepMind, Shevlane et al. 2023) (LW [LW · GW])
    • ARC Evals
      • Safety evaluations and standards for AI [EA · GW] (Barnes 2023)
      • Update on ARC's recent eval efforts (ARC 2023) (LW [LW · GW])
  • Safety standards

Transparency

Transparency enables coordination (and some regulation).

• Toward Trustworthy AI Development: Mechanisms for Supporting Verifiable Claims (Brundage et al. 2020)
  • Followed up by Filling gaps in trustworthy development of AI (Avin et al. 2021)
• Structured transparency
  • Exploring the Relevance of Data Privacy-Enhancing Technologies for AI Governance Use Cases (Bluemke et al. 2023)
  • Beyond Privacy Trade-offs with Structured Transparency (Trask and Bluemke et al. 2020)
• Honest organizations (Christiano 2018)
• Auditing & certification
  • Theories of Change for AI Auditing [LW · GW] (Apollo 2023) and other Apollo stuff
  • What does it take to catch a Chinchilla? Verifying Rules on Large-Scale Neural Network Training via Compute Monitoring (Shavit 2023)
  • Auditing large language models: a three-layered approach (Mökander et al. 2023)
    • The first two authors have other relevant-sounding work on arXiv
  • AGI labs need an internal audit function (Schuett 2023)
  • AI Certification: Advancing Ethical Practice by Reducing Information Asymmetries (Cihon et al. 2021)
  • Private literature review (2021)
• Model evaluations
  • Model evaluation for extreme risks (DeepMind, Shevlane et al. 2023) (LW [LW · GW])
  • Safety evaluations and standards for AI [EA · GW] (Barnes 2023)
  • Update on ARC's recent eval efforts (ARC 2023) (LW [LW · GW])

Publication practices

Labs should minimize/delay the diffusion of their capabilities research.

• Publication decisions for large language models, and their impacts [EA · GW] (Cottier 2022)
• Shift AI publication norms toward "don't always publish everything right away" in Survey on intermediate goals in AI governance [EA · GW] (Räuker & Aird 2023)
• "Publication norms for AI research" (Aird unpublished)
• Publication policies and model-sharing decisions (Wasil et al. 2023)

Structured access to AI models

• Sharing Powerful AI Models (Shevlane 2022)
• Structured access for third-party research on frontier AI models (GovAI, Bucknall and Trager 2023)
• Compute Funds and Pre-trained Models (Anderljung et al. 2022)

Governance structure

• How to Design an AI Ethics Board (Schuett et al. 2023)
• Ideal governance (for companies, countries and more) (Karnofsky 2022) (LW) has relevant discussion but not really recommendations

Miscellanea

• Do more/better safety research; share safety research and safety-relevant knowledge
  • Do safety research as a common good
    • Do and share alignment and interpretability research
    • Help people who are trying to be safe be safe
    • Make AI risk and safety more concrete and legible
      • See Larsen et al.'s Instead of technical research, more people should focus on buying time and Ways to buy time (2022)
  • Pay the alignment tax (if you develop a critical model)
• Improve your security (operational security, information security, and cybersecurity)
  • There's a private reading list on infosec/cybersec, but it doesn't have much about what labs (or others) should actually do.
• Plan and prepare: ideally figure out what's good, publicly commit to doing what's good (e.g., perhaps monitoring for deceptive alignment or supporting external model evals), do it, and demonstrate that you're doing it
  • For predicting and avoiding misuse
  • For alignment
  • For deployment (especially of critical models)
  • For coordinating with other labs
    • Sharing
    • Stopping
    • Merging
    • More
  • For engaging government
  • For increasing time 'near the end' and using it well
  • For ending risk from misaligned AI
  • For how to get from powerful AI to a great long-term future
  • Much more...
• Recommendation: Bug Bounties and Responsible Disclosure for Advanced ML Systems (Gray 2023)
  • See also this comment [LW(p) · GW(p)]
  • See OpenAI's bug bounty program
• Report incidents
• The Windfall Clause: Distributing the Benefits of AI for the Common Good (O'Keefe et al. 2020)
  • Also sounds relevant: Safe Transformative AI via a Windfall Clause (Bova et al. 2021)
• Watermarking^[2]
• Make, share, and improve a safety plan
  • OpenAI (LW [LW · GW]) (but their more recent writing on "AI safety" is more prosaic)
  • DeepMind [? · GW] (unofficial and incomplete)
    • See also Shah on DeepMind alignment work [LW(p) · GW(p)]
  • Anthropic (LW [LW · GW])
• Make share, and improve a plan for the long-term future
  • OpenAI (LW [LW · GW], Soares [LW · GW]); OpenAI (LW [LW · GW])
• Improve other labs' actions
  • Inform, advise, advocate, facilitate, support, coordinate
  • Differentially accelerate safer labs
• Improve non-lab actors' actions
  • Government
    • Support good policy
    • See AI policy ideas: Reading list (Stein-Perlman 2023)
  • Standards-setters
    • How technical safety standards could promote TAI safety [EA · GW] (O'Keefe et al. 2022)
    • Standards for AI Governance: International Standards to Enable Global Coordination in AI Research & Development (Cihon 2019)
  • Kinda the public
  • Kinda the ML community
• Support miscellaneous other strategic desiderata
  •  E.g. prevent new leading labs from appearing

See also

• Best Practices for Deploying Language Models (Cohere, OpenAI, and AI21 Labs 2022)
  • See also Lessons learned on language model safety and misuse (OpenAI 2022)
• Slowing AI [? · GW] (Stein-Perlman 2023)
• Survey on intermediate goals in AI governance [EA · GW] (Räuker and Aird 2023)

---

Some sources are roughly sorted within sections by a combination of x-risk-relevance, quality, and influentialness– but sometimes I didn't bother to try to sort them, and I haven't read all of them.

Please have a low bar to suggest additions, substitutions, rearrangements, etc.

Current as of: 9 July 2023.

1. ^{^}

   At various levels of abstraction, coordination can look like:
   - Avoiding a race to the bottom
   - Internalizing some externalities
   - Sharing some benefits and risks
   - Differentially advancing more prosocial actors?
   - More?

2. ^{^}

   Policymaking in the Pause (FLI 2023) cites A Systematic Review on Model Watermarking for Neural Networks (Boenisch 2021); I don't know if that source is good. (Note: this disclaimer does not imply that I know that the other sources in this doc are good!)

   I am not excited about watermarking. (Note: this disclaimer does not imply that I am excited about the other ideas in this doc! But I am excited about most of them.)

0 comments

Comments sorted by top scores.