Why don't you attend your local LessWrong meetup? / General meetup feedback
post by philh · 2014-04-27T22:17:01.129Z · LW · GW · Legacy · 20 commentsContents
20 comments
It's fairly common for a LessWrong meetup group to get people attending for a week or two, and then never showing up again. Most of the time, there may not be a very interesting reason for that. But if someone did have a bad experience at a meetup, this would be valuable information that they'd be unlikely to volunteer to the organizers.
Thus, I've created a form to collect meetup feedback. The primary purpose is: if you have a local LessWrong meetup that you don't currently attend, we'd like to know why. However, any other feedback is also appreciated: good feedback, bad-but-not-dealbreaking feedback, and feedback from people who do currently attend. "Currently" is left up to your own interpretation.
Please fill in the form now. It should only take a couple of minutes. There are three short-answer questions and three longer ones, but all questions are optional. Better to give a quick response now than to indefinitely postpone writing a longer one.
I intend to publish the responses, both raw and with some appropriate-seeming amount of aggregation. But I'm going to strip out the "where is your meetup" field from the public data. This is so that you can give feedback to a group without worrying about embarrassing them publicly. I'll tell the organizers which responses applied to them, so that the feedback still reaches the right place. If you identify the meetup in a long-form response, I won't strip that out. I'll also strip out the "anonymous identifier" field, naturally.
If you do currently attend a meetup, but want to give feedback anyway, please do also fill in the form.
If you think your answer seems boring, don't let that stop you: for example, we'd like to know relative numbers of "came once, had a bad time" versus "came once, but it's usually not convenient", and we can't do that if the second group don't reply.
Once again: please fill in the form now! If you comment that you have done so, I will reward you with an upvote.
20 comments
Comments sorted by top scores.
comment by Said Achmiz (SaidAchmiz) · 2014-04-28T06:26:23.730Z · LW(p) · GW(p)
I've filled in the form. I think this is a great idea.
comment by [deleted] · 2014-04-27T23:15:55.685Z · LW(p) · GW(p)
I'm starting a group in Houston, but went ahead and recorded my response as it applies to my attendance at the Austin group.
comment by blacktrance · 2014-04-29T17:27:28.910Z · LW(p) · GW(p)
Filled it in.
comment by Gunnar_Zarncke · 2014-04-28T21:40:38.350Z · LW(p) · GW(p)
I also filled in the form.
comment by Ixiel · 2014-04-28T11:40:33.645Z · LW(p) · GW(p)
Not sure how helpful my data is, but posted. Do I smell LW Adirondack on the wind? ;)
Replies from: Bayesliskcomment by VAuroch · 2014-05-04T19:30:53.009Z · LW(p) · GW(p)
Filled in. What will you do for places where there isn't a group organizer? There isn't anyone in Portland, for example; daenerys has done some of the work, but explicitly does not want to take the lead, and no one else has stepped forward.
Replies from: philhcomment by Gunnar_Zarncke · 2014-04-28T08:50:10.256Z · LW(p) · GW(p)
However, any other feedback is also appreciated: good feedback, bad-but-not-dealbreaking feedback, and feedback from people who do currently attend.
The form is worded to make some answeres ambigous when answered by attendees for example the field "how often did you attend" is harder to interpret by you if it is mixed with numbers from regular attendees (which are likely hight but irrelevant for analysis).
Replies from: Tenokecomment by tristanhaze · 2014-05-04T02:02:57.897Z · LW(p) · GW(p)
Filled in. This is a good idea. I would be interested in getting some feedback on the feedback, or seeing a writeup of some of the lessons or issues that come out of this.
Replies from: philh↑ comment by philh · 2014-05-04T08:50:01.864Z · LW(p) · GW(p)
Yes, if a group decides to change something about their meetup because of this, and gets more returning members (or current members report that it's more fun), I'd love to hear about it.
(I haven't looked closely at the results yet, I'll do that when they seem to have stopped trickling in, but it does look as though there's a fair amount of actionable feedback.)