comment by [deleted] ·
2016-02-08T11:56:10.316Z · LW(p) · GW(p)
Interesting thoughts this week
Are there handy references (like an app) that can output the following, given a particularly growing region, rather than have me have to look it all up individually? Crop, Soil, Harvest season, Sunlight, Pest control, Sowing season, Water and Spacing?
Of all DSM conditions, I reckon people with scrupolosity would have the worst insight (self awareness). Moreso than those with chronic pyschotic disorders. Too bad there's no literature on the topic. It's probably because it's so hard to identify scrupulotes, both because of that lack of insights, and because scrupolosity of often very high regarded, socially, albeit being harmful to the individual.
differential intellectual progress, differential technological development
I'm trying to live by Selgiman's PERMA positive psychology heuristic.
The question that Seligman seems to have borrowed from Aristotle is: What is the good that we choose for its own sake rather than because it makes a contribution to something else that we value? Aristotle’s answer was happiness. Aristotle also asked another question: What is the good that when isolated makes life desirable and lacking in nothing? I think he meant: What is it that makes life meaningful? Again, Aristotle’s answer is happiness. But, what Aristotle meant by happiness was more than just positive feelings, emotional well-being or life satisfaction. According to Aristotle, happiness is flourishing. Flourishing is the good that we choose for its own sake.
In my opinion, only the first 2: positive emotions and engagement fulfill that criteria.
Life is better already.
Available evidence suggests that limiting access to alcohol on campus through campus-wide bans may decrease the frequency of alcohol use and heavy drinking, but may not reduce binge drinking (Wechsler 2001a)
-What Works for Healh
Do you think universities should ban, or at least restrict funding to alcohol consumption on campuses?
'AUSTRALIA will never adopt a cash-for-organs scheme', ALP Shadow Health Minister Tanya Plibersek says.
Why so dogmatic? Are the Libs any better?
Raising for Effective Giving did it for Poker Players. Could this kinda outreach be done with any profession?
barring actual deprivation or trauma, children are largely who they are going to be as a result of their genetic makeup. In long-term measures of well-being, education and employment, parental influence exerts a temporary effect which disappears when we are no longer living with our parents. So costly added extras (music lessons, coaching and tutoring, private school fees) are probably not going to change your child’s life in the long term. (However, data on the antenatal environment suggests benefit to taking iodine, but avoiding ice-storms and licorice during pregnancy.) Sharing time together and finding common interests can build a good relationship and help a child develop without major costs.
Tonight I was feeling really depressed. Then I thought I would feel better if I donated to GiveDirectly, in the knowledge that their research supports improvements in psychological distress for the recipient population. Maybe regular donation could be tested for treatment for low mood? If that was the case, maybe governments would subsidise it just like they do other psychiatric interventions.