LessWrong 2.0 Reader

ng the lines of this quote:

Maybe add more quotes

The alignment of the CSH with reality

Change that one because Alignment is confusing there... And in the post 5 too.

I would REALLY like to see some head to head comparisons with you.com from a subject matter expert, which I think would go a long way in answering this question.

You are envisioning human-plue AGI being used for one purpose, when it will be used for many purposes.

When humans are obsolete for running small businesses, we will also be obsolete for nearly everything.

The big question is rate of conversion from human to AI workers. I really don't see how we avoid a dramatic global recession if even maybe 20% of jobs disappeared over a 3-year period. And the actuality could be worse than that.

I haven't gotten around to researching how much job loss, how quickly, economists think will cause major crashes. I tend to think economists aren't understanding the scope and likely rate of AI job replacement, while AI people aren't understanding how fragile economies can be.

Matching neartermist beliefs

 

Maybe remove those

OR Simultaneous appearance model

Add legend, add a one page summary at the start.

Any examples of where the starting resource allocation has more than 1 solution/equilibrium, assuming demand independence is violated?

puted as the derivate of $C{S}_w$ by $\%D$, $w$ stands for World. We derive with respect to $\%D$ (i.e., a proportional change in SFC density) because our causal impact is best modeled as shifting the probability that Humanity creates an SFC, and we impact the log odds of that probability.

Make sure its clear and correct. Maybe D at the end is bellow

Formalization

Make an one-page summary before that